🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to resume nuclear discussions with Washington provided that it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had originated from go-betweens to resume discussions with the US government. He asserted Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the global atomic watchdog to inspect struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Route

Araghchi is treading a difficult route since Iran does not want be seen to be operating from a stance of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more resilient defensively and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material within its borders that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Prior Negotiations Unexpectedly Terminated

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president asserting the locations had been obliterated. Following this, EU nations used their authority to reinstate international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Proposed

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could operate inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Officials claimed three times they had secured an understanding with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the deal to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Present Situation

Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be revived in some form if negotiations reopen.

The American leader recently claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet receiving clear proposals from the United States either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of non-responsiveness in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Position

In his remarks to the gathering, aimed to depict the US as a dominant force that abuses the idea of global regulations, Araghchi declared the fortnight-long engagement revealed the clash could not be settled by armed force. He stated the strikes started with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were executed with total Washington understanding and coordination, making faith hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Remains the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was America and the European states that had consistently tried to dictate their desires during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be viable and stays the primary resolution to address conflicts, but its criteria, rules and principles must be respected."

"If they address to the nation of Iran with the language of respect and respect, they will get a response in the identical language."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iranian officials as the battle of restoration and rebuilding, Araghchi claimed he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We gained many lessons from this war; we have identified our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He added: "We effectively endured this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to destroy, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but did not succeed to break. The citizens of Tehran have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more backing of the government and the nation in the aftermath of this assault."