🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.